Transposing Directives not so discretionary! The Courtroom of Justice forces transposition of discretionary exclusion grounds and hints at ‘intra-State’ vertical direct impact (C‑66/22) — Tips on how to Crack a Nut – Model Slux

Transposing Directives not so discretionary! The Courtroom of Justice forces transposition of discretionary exclusion grounds and hints at ‘intra-State’ vertical direct impact (C‑66/22) — Tips on how to Crack a Nut – Model Slux

** This remark was first printed as an Op-Ed for EU Legislation Stay on 8 December 2022 (see formatted model). I’m reposting it right here in case of broader curiosity. ** On the face of it, in Infraestruturas de Portugal and Futrifer Indústrias Ferroviárias (C-66/22), the Courtroom of Justice needed to assess whether or not … Read more

Matthews v MACIF. A uncommon and intensive dialogue on refusal of recognition beneath Brussels I and loads of grounds resulting in refusal of recognition of a French judgment issued in absentia. – Model Slux

Matthews v MACIF. A uncommon and intensive dialogue on refusal of recognition beneath Brussels I and loads of grounds resulting in refusal of recognition of a French judgment issued in absentia. – Model Slux

Thanks very a lot confrère Lucian Ilie for sharing copy of the hitherto unreported Thomas Hilton Matthews v Mutuelle Assurance des Commercants et Industriels de France [2023] EWHC 2175 (KB) – Matthews v MACIF for brief. Maître Ilie efficiently secured a Excessive Courtroom judgment (Ritchie J sitting on attraction) overturning registration with a view to … Read more

x