By BAGEHOT
THE AUGURIES for subsequent week’s Brexit votes will not be good, to place it mildly. The European Reform Group of hardline Eurosceptic MPs is split into two camps: those that are prepared to compromise with the prime minister provided that they get all the pieces they need; and those that will not be prepared to compromise even when they get all the pieces they need with a cherry on high (one Go away-supporting politician I do know tells me that about 30 of his colleagues at the moment are clinically insane). The DUP, Northern Eire’s largest get together, is in excessive dudgeon—or maybe I ought to say even larger dudgeon than typical—about being disrespected. The Labour Celebration exhibits no indicators of placing nation earlier than get together.
So it appears as if we’re heading for but additional paralysis. The prime minister will endure a heavy defeat in Tuesday’s vote on the withdrawal deal; parliament will vote towards a “no deal” Brexit on Wednesday; after which, on Thursday, it’s going to vote to increase Brexit. With no clear plans about what to do with this extension, Britain can have set itself up for one more interval (size to be determined) of paralysis and drift, culminating in one other cliff edge. A very distasteful type of Groundhog Day.
The prime minister’s solely likelihood of breaking this logjam is to do one thing dramatic. Right here’s one concept: supply to resign from the prime ministership with virtually quick impact if parliament votes her deal via. She might say that she’s going to regard her job as carried out if she will get Brexit via parliament. It should then be as much as her successor to information Britain via the quick post-Brexit maze. She might add that, if parliament can’t make up its thoughts, she can have no alternative however to remain on for yet another heave.
This may simply have the impact of stunning sufficient MPs to rally behind the prime minister. Conservatives would rally as a result of they’re determined to provide another person an opportunity. A major variety of Labour, Liberal Democrat and Impartial Group MPs may also rally as a result of they might be confronted with somebody who was visibly placing the nation earlier than her profession. Slightly than “salvaging” a Tory Brexit, Labour MPs could be waving goodbye to a Tory prime minister. Wavering MPs of all events would realise that they face a stark alternative: do they need extra months of the prime minister robotically repeating the identical inventory phrases or do they need to shake issues up?
This could do wonders for Mrs Could’s repute (keep in mind she’s promised to not lead the Tory Celebration into the subsequent election). Slightly than being remembered as the girl who “misplaced” the 2017 election and bungled the Brexit negotiations she could be remembered for sacrificing herself for the nation—and for making one of the crucial dramatic gestures in British political historical past. A day of heroism would assist to cancel out months of dithering. It will do wonders for the Tory Celebration, which might then be capable of select between a group of completely competent successors, corresponding to Sajid Javid, the house secretary, and Jeremy Hunt, the overseas secretary. It will be capable of clear the Cupboard of the useless wooden that has gathered there below Mrs Could, significantly Chris Grayling, the transport secretary. It will be capable of shift its focus from delivering Brexit to repairing the nation (although Brexit negotiations can be happening for years, they are going to be extra technical and fewer headline-grabbing than the present spherical). Each events are in such a dismal state that the one which tries to repair itself first by eliminating its present chief and bringing in a brand new era of expertise can have a giant benefit.
A far-fetched suggestion maybe. However the different—a defeat in parliament, extra months of negotiation, a crumbling authorities—is one thing to be prevented in any respect prices.
****
I’M FREQUENTLY instructed that the British don’t do sufficient to honour their intellectuals. The French revere even the spikiest figures, corresponding to Michel Houellebecq (who most actually deserves to be revered). The British against this would reasonably give a platform to second-rate comedians than critical thinkers. James Marriott made this level in an article within the Occasions this week (“Britain ought to be taught to like its intellectuals”). Perry Anderson as soon as wrote a ponderous essay on why the French are a lot cleverer than the British as a result of they recognised the genius of Louis Althusser, who turned out to be a wife-murdering lunatic.
The BBC’s fondness for second-rate comedians is among the nice puzzles of our age. Radio 4 appears to have a slot at 12.30 day-after-day reserved for individuals who don’t know the distinction between being humorous and being half-witted. However I ponder about the concept Britain doesn’t worth intellectuals. The British have constructed palaces for no less than a number of the most distinguished examples of the species within the type of Oxford and Cambridge schools. The “good pondering” sections of bookshops are bursting with volumes, a few of which do precisely what’s on the bundle. John Grey, who’s undoubtedly an mental, and a delightfully gloomy one at that, enjoys a distinguished platform in British life. Isaiah Berlin, Mr Grey’s tutor, was loaded down with honours, together with a knighthood and the Order of Benefit, for being such an excellent author and talker.
****
NOT that each one intellectuals are price taking note of. It’s not possible to have a look at the mental enthusiasms of the last decade from the mid-Nineties to the mid-2000s with no sense of embarrassment. Virtually each so-called large concept that seized the creativeness of the period—from the wonders of Silicon Valley to the knowledge of crowds to the inevitable triumph of liberal democracy—turned out to be tosh (I write this as somebody who contributed to this tosh myself). We had been instructed that Silicon Valley would produce a brand new, free-wheeling kind of capitalism that may put the world’s data at our fingertips. Now the valley is ruled by a group of company giants which can be basically within the promoting enterprise, subordinating data to the good calling of promoting us stuff. We had been instructed that crowds had been the repositories of all knowledge, and that consultants ought to bow down earlier than the all-knowing individuals. Now we see populist rage destroying our establishments and debasing our civilisation.
I spend as a lot time as I can in the mean time studying issues written within the mid-Victorian period—significantly the 1860s—as a result of the mid-Victorians had been grappling with the collapse of Benthamite liberalism in a lot the identical manner that we’re grappling with the collapse of neo-liberalism. I’m struck not solely by how good books like Matthew Arnold’s “Tradition and Anarchy” (1869) and John Stuart Mill’s “The Subjection of Ladies” (1869) are, however how immediately they converse to our personal time. I ponder what readers will suppose, 150 years from now, once they learn Tom Friedman’s “The Lexus and the Olive Tree” (1999) or James Surowiecki “The Knowledge of Crowds” (2004).
